???

Something important to me in the creation of this site and the content in it, is to be transparent about which things are entirely created by me and which things AI were used in to help with the construction, whether it's graphical or written. What should be understood is that, without actually doing the math, I would have to say 99% of the design & graphical content is entirely of my construction in every form and way. However, there are a couple of things that AI was used to help regarding design, and when text is involved, ultimately created the words for.

• The first thing that you interact with is the front page interface... This is based on an earlier concept I had developed in the 90s for a website interface. Obviously, at that time, the internet was a very young thing, and nowhere near the same level of technological sophistication as we currently have.
  
  However, at some point when I brought this idea up to my custom GPT, 'The Chaos System', it mentioned that some of the ideas I was thinking of were likely accomplishable using an SVG. What I didn't know was that a single SVG on the web could contain multiple layers. I just never had any need to have a multi-layered SVG be a part of web graphics (it's antithetical to optimization best practices). Because you could maintain those layers, it meant that, based on how you named things, those layer names could be used to target the changes in different interface elements depending on user interactions.
  
  So I went through the process of figuring out the design completely on my own. I should mention the design itself of the original symbol months back I did have some help with coming up with. Conceptually, adding the circuit traces was done through The Chaos System as well, which I then vectorized and cleaned up and refined. But otherwise, all of the work to build the graphics itself were done by me. Every nitty-gritty of it. Full optimization, reducing every graphical element down to a single layer, no matter how many parts it had to it, and if necessary, in any given state, might include a second layer for a background.
  
  The final size of the SVG after I found a web-based SVG optimizer that didn't screw up the code, landed the SVG having around 800 kilobytes in size, which is very small. I had initially considered doing a one-color version which would then show color when you hovered or touched the node links, but I came to the conclusion that restraint made more sense here because the rest of the site is full of plenty of intense color when it comes to digital art and design, and that wasn't the point in what this was for. Of course, a big side effect of that is that the file size can end up being extremely small as well, and it avoids having to figure out whether or not, because you're adding other color elements, you're going to end up introducing raster elements into the final SVG, which I wanted to completely avoid.
  
  How this ended up fully working was, I'd gotten to a point in a discussion I was in regarding the website and its content with The Chaos System, where I started getting a message from the ChatGPT app itself telling me that this session was getting to be too big, which is, if you've worked with these kinds of things enough, you know, extremely frustrating when you're in the middle of something with a lot of moving parts. This forced me to then create a document which included every single concept of how I wanted this user interface to behave, to the very last details. I spent the time to build all of the graphics out, all of the different states, all of the different nodes, which would be the links, the way that each node inverts itself as you roll over or touch them, and the center part, which is an expanded version of what that content represents. As a part of the original conversation, it had also mentioned that one of my frustrations was unnecessary because touch-based and mouse-based interactions were completely distinct in a browser. So it could be designed in such a way that it worked completely differently depending on if you were on a tablet or a phone versus on the desktop. That's awesome. The document I created describing all of the different states possible, including the difference between touch-based and mouse-based operation, and then PNG versions of every single state that it could be in, showing what it would look like depending on which node was being touched, was inside of the same PDF. I dropped that PDF in as the primary document for context into a new session, and in very short order, it was able to basically one-shot the final code. The level of detail I had gone into, I think, is what enabled this. It's also a relatively smart LLM.
  
  This was all broken up into three different sections of code in one code block, and a single SVG to pull as the graphical element. And through a very short amount of trial and error, it worked. Almost perfectly initially. The only thing we had to do next is go through and find out why certain things were not working as I expected them to, realizing that this was more of an issue of different browsers and the way that they rendered things like CSS. After just a couple of tries, we got it working in every instance. Then because I'd rather have it be 100% optimized than not, I looked through the console on every web rendering engine version that anybody was likely to use, i.e. WebKit, Chromium, and whatever Firefox's version is called, and eliminated every single console error.
  
  Then the structure of the code made it so that, for the most part, the only area that I'd need to go into to adjust anything about how the interface operates was in the CSS section at the top, where it has all of the timing and the types of shadows, a.k.a. outer glows, that we're going to illuminate the timing of the change between different element states, etc.
• Something else I do use AI for is to help write some things. The way I see it is as more of a partner than anything. And while it may be the one in the end that generates the text that you're reading, the level of time and detail required to get to the place where it is writing what I want it to write is intensive. It comes through a process that I call alignment, which I get into in the AI page.
  
  Depending on exactly what it is that I'm trying to accomplish determines how much time it takes to get to that place. On the website itself, there are three main places where this was done. The most obvious ones will be on the AI page itself and on the final page called Context (which if you're following through this in the order I've suggested, will be the last of the six different links you visit.
  
  The two of those were written by AI using concepts and ideas that I worked out with it over quite a bit of time. On the AI page, the two main documents that are in there, one which is over 100 pages and the other which is over 200, were developed using AI as well, with it doing the final writing.
  
  The methodology that I developed uses a form of extrapolation as well as the initial alignment, where I will develop an outline and then we'll go through each one of those different subsections or topics and expand upon them.
  
  I am completely comfortable being open about the fact that that is where the result comes from. I don't think it detracts from the value in any way. I think AI is good for what it's good for, and for me, to a large degree, that's been taking the ridiculous amount of crazy complicated ideas that I've had running through my head for my whole life and giving them some kind of a structure that can be put into a form that can be meaningfully communicated to other people.
  
  I don't have any problem with communicating in speaking or writing, or writing in general. But the kind of structure that it uses to take all of the disparate concepts that I have in my head and put them together in an understandable way is just something I have to admit it does a better job at than me. It's able to hold all of the different concepts as I'm working my way through them in my head and transcribing them in as the session prompt, so to speak.
  
  While I can work my way through all of those topics and all those connections and all of the parts, maintaining a working memory of every single one of those things isn't exactly easy, not simultaneously. I can certainly find my way to every single element, but holding that context all at once is difficult, if not outright impossible, given the way the prefrontal cortex and active memory work.
  
  Communicating it to another person through writing or words is difficult as well. Through words, it's slightly easier in some senses because the communication feedback I can get through them will let me know, to some degree, how they think, how they associate with words, the way they frame reality, so that I can then adjust how I'm speaking about what I'm trying to communicate in a way that I understand they might be more likely to grok the deeper meaning of.
  
  But when it comes to actually fully structuring it in a sensible order into something like a document, that's just not my knack. Coming up with the ideas, digging into them to ridiculous depth, sure. Turning it into something that can go on into perpetuity in written form, and be satisfied with, that's a different story.
  
  AI is extremely helpful in doing that. In fact, the main way that I see my relationship with AI, is that it is a cognitive extension of my own ability to think about all of the things that I am trying to work out to a degree that is difficult even to do with other humans. Other humans have biases. They have framing. They have implicit definitions for basic concepts that will be different than mine. The amount of compensation necessary in the communication itself ends up creating enough of a cognitive load that in and of itself it detracts from the ability to communicate these things. Discussing things with an AI in this way is completely different.
  
  It doesn't seem to have the same issues, and it is able to hold all of the context regardless of how bizarrely I may have connected things or created associations between them.
  
  However, all the ideas are mine. Sure, sometimes it pushes back on ideas if, based on what it's been trained on, it doesn't think they make sense. That just means that I haven't explained it properly, and so more alignment is required, or I learn and adapt my idea.
  
  We go through the process of going back and forth and refining the understanding until it gets to a place where there are no more critiques or refinements (by me) of how it understands what I'm trying to create, and all that's left to do is generate the text.
  
  For the original Chaos System PDF, which describes a new audio paradigm, some of the original building structures and operations I would like to personally create, all of my YouTube strategy, app development, everything in there, that one probably took 20 hours to fully figure out, and then however much time it took me to add in the graphics and format everything.
  
  For the other PDF in there, which is the one over 200 pages, called 'Boundary Conditions for Human Emergence', that one probably took twice the amount of time, if not more. It's a very different kind of concept. The AI doesn't have the same kind of references to as many of the ideas, but it has enough so that there is similarity in it to what it knows. And so with whatever it can add that it already has understanding about, put in context with what it is that I'm trying to say, it can help.
  
  For the Context page, it probably took me the same amount of time to have it help me write that as it did to write the 200-page document. Initially, this might seem absurd, but because of what it was that I was trying to accomplish, and the way I was trying to accomplish what I was trying to say, and because these ideas are novel, and that means that it doesn't have a lot of references that it can go to to bring in information from what it's been trained to understand, it just takes that much more time. Nonetheless, I think what was created should do what I was looking for it to do.
• You might notice that I didn't describe the third thing that I used AI to help me write. I would rather you discover that area of the website on your own. It should be obvious enough what it is when you see it, because the writing style will change enough that it'll stand out a little bit. And because of where you are, it'll probably make sense why I'd prefer you to discover it than just tell you what it is.
• While I did use AI to help me with some bits of code snippets here and there throughout the website, regarding the content itself, including the design and graphics of the website, everything that I've created over the years (obviously, anything up till a certain point couldn't have been done with AI), unless it is explicitly mentioned that I did use AI, I didn't.
  
  AI is not the first place I go to for visually or auditorialy creating anything. I've been a creator my entire life. Over my time with AI, it has offered on many occasions to create things for me. And while I have used it to generate quite a few interesting images, I don't put those up as representations of my own work unless it was only a part of a developmental phase. I feel like my refinements and adjustments and then treatments of the same thing warrant calling it my own work. And in that case, I do mention that it was involved as a part of the process.
  
  So for everything, it is 100% coming from my brain and how I think, my way of seeing the world through the lens of systems and processes, and what my aesthetics and taste are all about. All of the writing, other than the things specified, are completely mine with no help from AI. What you're seeing is a representation of me, technically even the stuff that AI helped with. In no way do I think that it is writing something for me, that being ideas that I didn't have. In fact, in no way is that the case. If anything, I make sure to take as much time as it takes in order to be sure that the end result is exactly what I want it to be, down to the last detail. And then for many of those, there are little tweaks that I will go back into and edit.
  
  The point is, regardless of what it is you're looking at, and the few things that I partnered with AI on, they are all my ideas.

You might be asking: Why am I describing everything about how I made things or had help writing them and not just telling you I used AI to help me with those particular things? Well, a decent amount of what this site's trying to accomplish is allowing you to understand how I think. And if you've read the AI page or when you do, you'll realize that there are different types of strategies for how I work with AI.

Simply just being transparent and admitting that I had help doesn't really say anything specifically. It doesn't really make it clear whether or not someone really did or didn't create much of something. I think this does a lot more to tell the story about my connection with how I use and partner with AI instead of simply making this feel like an ethics check or something along those lines.